Debriefing with Me Swinwood, Canadian Lawyer: Crime Against Humanity and Genocide - Continued Page 3
Debriefing with Me Swinwood, Canadian lawyer: crime against humanity and genocide
CONTINUED
CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
The complainants state that since 3 March 2020 the conditions imposed correspond to the second definition of genocide. The United Nations Convention on Genocide states: "Imposing living conditions designed to cause mental or physicalharm." leaders have neglected human beings spiritually, emotionally, mentally and physically since March 2, 2020.
The complainants are seeking damages from the accused for genocide and apartheid from that date until the end of oppression.
The complainants state that some of the accused have been publicly identified for committing an act of genocide in Kenya - WHO, Gates Foundation. Those who now cooperate with them in the madness of mass vaccinations around the world, for a disease of unknown source and with a cure rate of 98.01%, are also complicit in the crimes of genocide and apartheid.
The AGENDA
The global agenda seems to revolve around the pandemic, testing and vaccination. The complainants state that publicly available scientific and medical information does not support the declaration of a pandemic. They will prove that the pandemic definition has been manipulated by WHO for harmful reasons and not for medical or scientific reasons.
WHO Director-General Dr Tedros A Ghebreyesus has been charged with genocide at the International Criminal Court. The UN and WHO with the bill and the Gates Foundation committed genocide in Kenya.
The concept of a pandemic has been declared, not to fight an infectious disease known as COVID-19 (although it has always existed), but to respond to a harmful agenda. The disease can be properly treated without vaccination, it is a recovery rate of 98.01% and appropriate treatments for the disease have been removed worldwide.
More worrying is global censorship against anyone who defies the conventional wisdom of the need to declare a pandemic. The group states that censorship violates their Charter of Rights in paragraphs 2a) and 2b) and entitles them to compensation in accordance with section 24 of the Charter.
Pandemic
The complainants state that the use of terror of children and the elderly is part of the agenda of those who are handling this health crisis. The obligation of living conditions since 2 March 2020 has caused mental and physical damage to children and the elderly.
The group is seeking damages for the PCR tests of genocide and apartheid on behalf of children and the elderly.
Test
The complainants state that there is ample scientific and medical evidence that the PCR "test" is unnecessary. Most scientists will agree that defining PCR cycles beyond the 25-cycle cycle threshold renders the tool unnecessary.
Most, if not all, PCR test kits are set at 45,making the results unnecessary and misleading. However, the positive results are used to increase the reported number of patients to fuel the lie of the spread of the disease - just that - a lie. The plaintiff and the action class claim that doctors around the world receive an additional fee to declare a heart dead of attack or death from a car accident, death of COVID-19. Why subterfuge?
Vaccinations
The complainants state that the WHO/Gates/UN Foundation has been identified as having committed an act of genocide by sterilizing 500,000 Kenyan girls and women. They say they are facing another act of genocide unless it is stopped quickly and officials and authorities explain themselves. They state that it was not the flu that killed in the Spanish flu of 1917, but the vaccinations that killed 50 million people worldwide.
They declare that the world's proposed vaccination programme is a biological war waged on humanity.
DAMAGE/OFFENCES
Covid Measures: The complainants state that the federal, provincial and municipal governments followed the example of "a pandemic declaration by WHO", an organization that manipulated the definition of a pandemic to adapt it to its own harmful program (andengaged in an act of genocide in Kenya). The pandemic declaration was not based on medical advice, but rather on the advice of a corrupt and genocidal organization.
All provincials and municipal governments followed suit by basing their actions on a pandemic declaration by WHO.
- Federal measures: J. Trudeau held daily press conferences to "inform" Canadians about decrees and orders, such as "stay at home," which have no legal value, notwithstanding the fact that they were enforced by municipal and provincial enforcement officers, but at no time did the federal Parliament invoke the federal emergency law.
- Provincial Measures: On March 17, 2020, the Premier of Ontario and his government invoked the provincial Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, with a declared "emergency" extended in July 2020, and have so far adopted 48 regulations with enforcement orders.
The net and summary effect of the ordinances contained in the Regulation is as follows: Ordering the closure of all businesses, with the exception of "essential" businesses related to food and medicine.
A "social distance" of two (2) metres; no "public gathering" of more than five unrelated persons, with a distance "of two metres, subsequently increased to ten people; restaurant and bar closures, with the exception of take-out; material closure of all public and private schools, daycares and universities; mandatory use of face masks, mandated by the Ministry of Health, to all medical medical regulatory medical services colleges, to direct all their authorized members to impose mandatory masking of all patients, employees and members, in their workplace; Closure of all park amenities, including all playgrounds and children's facilities; elimination of individual programs and all other programs for children with special needs, and those with neurological and physical disabilities
Prohibit all public gatherings of more than five people, notwithstanding a distance of two meters, including the prohibition of religious services, including restriction on marriages, funerals and other religious actions, rituals and rites.
The provision relating to offences, indictments and the imposition of hefty fines violates orders, with the impossibility of challenging these fines as the Offences Court was (and could again) be physically closed and the Provincial Court the contraventions of the Offences Act clearly indicate that the charge and line cannot be "posted" but that the person must physically appear in the Provincial Offences Court to file a defence of the charges, only to find a closed courthouse.
The City of Ottawa has adopted provincial and municipal rules that impose requirements and restrictions on: face masks, social gatherings, restaurants, bars, meeting and event spaces, sports, exercises and gymnasiums, places of worship, casinos, bingo halls and gambling establishments, cinemas, performing arts facilities, retail, personal care services and the list goes
The plaintiffs state that the allegations of WHO, our federal agency, the provincial and municipal governments, as well as the mainstream media, claiming that we face the greatest threat to humanity in our lifetime, areFAUSSE. The mathematical modelling used to justify extreme containment measures is invalid.
In addition, the vast majority of the population is not at risk of complications or mortality from exposure to COVID-19.
The massive and indiscriminate containment of citizens, the restriction of access to our economy, the courts, parliament and our livelihoods, medical and therapeutic care, and the obligation of physical distancing and other restrictions are measures that have never been implemented or tested, without scientific or medical basis.
The physical, emotional, psychological and economic well-being impact of these measures is profoundly destructive, unjustified and manifestly unsustainable.
These drastic isolation measures are not supported by evidence. There is considerable consensus in the scientific community that such measures are neither sustainable nor justified, and while these measures may delay viral spread, they are unlikely to have an impact on overall morbidity.
The fact is that this discourse on the COVID-19 pandemic arouses an unnecessary panic used to justify the government's systematic violations of the rights and freedoms that form the basis of our society, including our constitutional rights, our sovereignty, our privacy, our rule of law, financial security and even our own democracy. it is clear that significant violations of the rights and freedoms of applicants have been perpetrated by the federal, provincial and municipal governments and health authorities.
The fact is that, because of all of the above, the plaintiffs have suffered and continue to suffer from serious violations of their constitutional rights that are not justified by any measure, including art. 1 of the Charter. The prejudices/wrongdoing of the complainants will be more specifically placed in a future document. The urgency of filing this document is paramount.
Conclusion
The complainants allege general tort actions and breach of fiduciary duty, mischief in the civil service, gross negligence, as well as assault offences, including genocide and apartheid and complicity in genocide and apartheid.
They state that their lawyers participate in a global alliance with lawyers, doctors and scientists who are expressing a collective alarm against these draconian measures unsupported by medical or scientific demonstration. They are proposing that the case be tried in Ottawa.
Date: December 21, 2020
ELDERS WITHOUT BORDERS, MICHAEL SWINWOOD / LIZA SWALE
STACY AMIKWABE et al. -and- IPO, et al.
Defendants
Happy New Year 2021 to all, which will be the year of the world renaissance by the Law! There is nothing to fear, except Fear itself.
Jus cogens (from the binding Latin law, often translated as an imperative standard) concerns principles of rights deemed universal and superior and should form the basis of the mandatory norms of general international law. This concept is defined by the Vienna Convention of 23 May 1969, in Article 53: "For the purposes of this Convention, an imperative standard of general international law is a standard accepted and recognized by the international community of States as a whole as a standard to which no derogation is permitted and which can only be modified by a new standard of general international law of the same character.
- Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes Act. SC 2000, 2.
- Criminal Code of Canada (LRC, 1985, c.C-46), art. 318 (2).
Article 13: "An intervention to modify the human genome cannot be undertaken for preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic purposes and only if its purpose is to introduce no modifications into the genome of its descendants.
Auteur(s): Dr Gerard Delepine for FranceSoir, Translated by FranceSoir
PAGE 1 | PAGE 2 | PAGE 3 | PAGE 4
