Judges Rule: PCR Tests are Unreliable | Lockdowns and Quarantine is “illegal detention”
"If one man craves freedom -- liberty -- he must remember that all other men long for the same freedom. Groups of such liberty-loving mortals cannot live together in peace without becoming subservient to such laws, rules, and regulations as will grant each person the same degree of freedom while at the same time safeguarding an equal degree of freedom for all of his fellow mortals. If one man is to be absolutely free, then another must become an absolute slave. And the relative nature of freedom is true socially, economically, and politically. Freedom is the gift of civilization made possible by the enforcement of LAW."
2020-11-20
![]()
"Only a doctor can diagnose this or any other disease.", say two judges from the court's 3rd criminal division.
(source)
On August 20, 4 German persons were MANDATORY put in quarantine. Even then, a judge in Ponta Delgada ruled that this was “illegal deprivation of liberties” and they had to be released IMMEDIATELY on August 27.
(source)
In the specific case, the four tourists were never contacted by telephone in their language, let alone a doctor "Which is frankly inexplicable given the alleged severity of the infection", underlines the verdict. Apart from the quarantines of the four Germans, these isolations also happened at the national level. These too have been declared illegal
(source)
“Politicians do not decide who will be quarantined for medical reasons. Only a doctor can recommend it and a judge can assign it. ”
The court wondered since when is it up to a court or politicians to make clinical diagnoses, on their own initiative and based on the final results of a test (proven unreliable)?
“Since when is the diagnosis of a disease made by decree or by law? Since the applicant has more than one duty to notify, a diagnosis is a medical act and therefore the sole responsibility of a doctor. ”
“And even then, the health authority does not have the power to take away someone's freedoms. A doctor or health institution can diagnose the disease, but it is still up to the judge to recommend isolation. ” "The standards invoked by the GGD, which supported the applicants' deprivation of liberty through a report of prophylactic isolation, are non-binding administrative guidelines for applicants", they argue in the judgment. In other words: isolation or other measures imposed by a doctor or a medical administrative entity is not binding, only an advice that can be reviewed by the judge. This is the same ruling as that of the various Azores courts of first instance issued habeas corpus in other cases, as well as the ruling used by the Constitutional Court in an identical case, in which it considered mandatory quarantine for tourists in the region as a illegal detention.
(source)
Judges at Ratton Palace say this is imposing isolation “is in no way justified because it looks like a short prison sentence with perhaps even more serious measures than a convicted offender. Prisoners are still allowed to play sports. People in isolation are not, is one of the examples added by the judges. ”
Additional sources:
This is the statement and you will have to make do with it.
2020-11-20
GO TO SOURCE